Decision Premature!

The Outlook magazine reads “SC Bar Association Not to Engage Tainted Singhvi”. As I understand Law, there is two terminology:
1) Acquitted,
2) Convicted
Boycotting a Convict is understandable but should an Accused/Tainted Man be boycotted? Let’s give the Man a fair chance to defend himself and let the court decide his guilt. Issue of chamber cancellation, and Resolution on not to engage him is Premature, I believe.