jUDGE: not a judge always..

In Warangal college, some candidates taking LLM exams were caught, who were not delinquent college students, but senior judges of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. They took the first-year LLM exam because if they passed, they would have been eligible for promotions and increments. And media got a chance 2 dance upon. Lawyers started shouting... Court ka ghusa aab nikalenge..

"The judiciary is the final recourse for common people to get justice - and if the judges indulge in this kind of malpractice, how can you trust the judgment of the courts?'' asks Ravi Kumar of the Warangal Bar Association.

I don't support cheating but I find any rationality in this argument either. It is immaterial, whether they were judges or anyone else. In a examination hall, a person writing paper is just a examinee/candidate. When a judge is giving justice he is acting under a different capacity.. Can any sensible person here say that none of our present judges have ever cheated in exams, even in Std. VI or VII or LLB?? If u say, they have never cheated, after appointment as judge, i don't see any difference...

Dear friends of law, Be aware, if you cheat in your exam, your judgments will not be binding!!!

@others: don't obey but be ready for punishment under contempt of court…